Innocent
until proven guilty? Not a relevant phrase in the world of NFL commissioner,
Roger Goodell. Yesterday, the public was finally given a decision from
Goodell on Tom Brady's appeal of the 4 game suspension he was given this past
May. This punishment was handed down to Brady personally, along with a $1
million fine and the loss of two future draft picks on the New England Patriots
team. These punishments came as a result of the highly insubstantial Wells
Report. All of this comes back to the AFC championship game vs the Colts, which
by the way, the Patriots won 45-7. Next thing you know, the Patriots were
being accused of deflating footballs. There is so much wrong with the
entire "Deflategate" situation and the handling of it by the league.
I could go on and on about each flawed basis of the circumstances but to
keep things short and sweet, I'll stay focused on four key points that I feel
the need to address, especially for those that talk, talk, talk, without any
knowledge of the actual situation.
1.
Where is the evidence?
Four
time super bowl champion, Tom Brady, is being blamed for and accused of having
knowledge of purposeful deflation of the footballs used in the Patriots' AFC
championship game vs the Indianapolis Colts this past season. This blame
is being assigned to one of the NFL's greatest ever with no hard evidence. What
is the basis of the accusatory claims toward Tom Brady? The answer is
speculation and the Wells report which, if we are being honest with ourselves,
is simply more speculation. The report stated that it was "more
probable than not" that Tom Brady was "generally aware" of
football deflation having taken place. The laughable qualities of that
claim are so strong. The ridiculousness of the penalties being put on Tom Brady
and the Pats based on these empty accusations is so over the top and extremely
nonsensical.